Thursday, September 5, 2013

I recently read several books for a seminary class on Islam.   I will post these reviews here. 

subject: Notes on reading for CIU course ICS/MIS 6073, “Islam in the 21st century”
with Dr. Nabeel Jabbour
date:      Tuesday, August 20, 2013


Burge, Gary. Jesus and the Land: The New Testament Challenge to Holy Land
Theology. Baker Academic, 2010. ISBN 879-0-8010-3898-3 

BOOK Abstract 

Mr. Burge, a professor at Wheaton College, seeks to present a biblical study on the meaning of the Holy Land and to challenge some teachings that retain a territorial facet which then support ongoing problems in practical relations in the volatile Mideast.  Chronologically working through the Bible he discusses the understandings concerning the land by the prophets, the Jews of the Diaspora, Jesus himself, and careful studies of key passages in the rest of the NT, especially Paul’s teachings.  He teaches that all the Old Testament symbols have undergone a profound shift away from a literal item, including the land and the temple, and need to be reinterpreted by Jesus’ work and death on the cross. 

BOOK Comment 

  1. Evaluate the book. How do you agree and disagree with the author? 
“Early Christians … would have been astonished if they came upon men and woman who promoted a Christian version of Jewish territorialism” (Burge, 71).  The author is amazed, too, that such thinking continues to this day, and I’m glad he has made the effort to study and teach on this key concept of the Bible.  He began with a quote from W Brueggemann “that the land might be the central theme of biblical faith.” (Burge, 1)  I wouldn't go that far; is not the revelation of God and the work of Jesus’ atonement for mankind really the central theme?  He also claimed on the first page that Ezekiel saw Israel “as the center of the earth” (Burge, 1).  None of the versions, however, that I consulted in several languages translate the Hebrew word thus.  At first I was hesitant to listen, but he grew on me, and I much appreciate the main arguments and especially the concept that Jesus fulfilled or reinterpreted many of the symbols of the NT in himself and in his own work of the cross, including especially the land/Jerusalem/temple set of powerful images..

  1. How did this book challenge your prejudices and your assumptions? 
I don’t think I’d realized until now how pervasive is the “holy land” theology of the Zionist, both Jew and Christian, and how much it has seriously influenced politics concerning the Mideast.  In pioneering evangelism to Muslims in West Africa we have often put teaching on the return of Christ on a back burner as it is so complicated and so seemingly unnecessary for the new believer.  This book and its related CIU course have helped me understand the implications of mistakes in this crucial area, and have also helped me see the value again of these studies.  

  1. What lessons can be learned from this book? 
Quite a few times in the book the concept, variously called fulfillment, reinterpretation, redefinition, reconfiguration, relocating, overturning, etc., has been advanced.  This doctrine is much beyond simply saying the prophets wonderfully spoke of Christ’s coming and death over and over.  I met this concept recently in another book by Wells and Zaspel concerning the issues of the law being reinterpreted in Christ in the NT.[1]  I think it would be good for the many Christian tourists in the Mideast to learn, for  example, that, “Hebrews writes the heavenly Jerusalem is the destination of people of faith.  …  This holy geography was accessible from any province or city.  Therefore by  relocating the true Jerusalem, Hebrews undercuts any need for literal pilgrimage to Judea.  …  In other words, in order to join the heavenly Jerusalem, something must be left  behind—the old  Jerusalem must be exited—in order to join Jesus who himself had no part in the city itself in  his death” (Burge, 98-99).  AMEN. 

  1. How did this book impact your thinking, your convictions, and your life? 
Fallacies in interpretation of the Bible can easily lead to wrong thinking about many issues.  Burge would be better to say that misunderstanding land is a central fallacy of many Christians, and that this mistake contributes to serious social and political errors concerning Israel by all parties!  I would like to help Christians avoid this fallacy and the resulting errors and rather help them see the complete freeing beauty of what Jesus Christ has done for mankind in the gospel. 
END

The teacher requested these two statements, if true:
I have read the whole book from cover to cover. 
I did not read any of the book reviews on the internet.  My response and book review is based only on my reading of the book.



[1] Wells, Tom & Fred Zaspel.  New Covenant Theology: Description, Definition, Defense (Frederick, MD: New Covenant Media, 2002).



No comments: